PL EN
Wydawnictwo
AWSGE
Akademia Nauk Stosowanych
WSGE
im. Alcide De Gasperi
BOOK CHAPTER (133-146)
Economical and Public Administration Aspects of Biodiversity Maintenance
 
More details
Hide details
 
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The maintenance of biodiversity is pre-condition of the biosphere’s sustainable state that forms the necessary terms of human physical existence on the Earth and socio-economic system functioning. Biodiversity maintenance is a public administration action result and economic mechanisms that provide the socio-economic system functioning. A biodiversity determines quantitative and quality composition of ecosystems predetermines pre-conditions of biosphere firmness. The maintenance of biodiversity in Ukraine has a difficult hierarchical structure of authority, and is characterized by the inconsistency and the unclear functions and duties allocation. The biovariety maintainance function is represented only in 4 % from the general amount of regions of Ukraine in the public administration organizational structure of environment protection. Most part (56 %) belongs to the regions which have the public administration incorporated function in biovariety maintainance industry. All of these require a scientific justification and subsequent improvement of management organizational structure of biovariety maintainance in Ukraine. The analysis of state and local management systems of the Ukrainian biodiversity has been done. The biodiversity conservation functions analysis and classification have been carried out. The economic effect of biodiversity functioning has been estimated using forests and swamps ekosystems as an example. The necessity of biodiversity in the GDP of the state has been justified.
 
REFERENCES (12)
1.
Parki narodowe. Cuda Polski. Edukacja Powszechna (2003). Fabijanski P. Wydawnictwo Podsiedlic-Raniowski i Spolka, 2003. – 112 p.
 
2.
Insurance line violations Stability sredoobrazuyuschyh ecosystem functions (2008). Motkyn G.A. Proceedings of the third Scientific Conference “Ecological-economic mechanism for Saving Biodiversity Especially ohranyaemыh.
 
3.
pryrodnыh territories.” - Kamenyuki, 2008. - S. 26-28.
 
4.
Global Benefits: Valuing Biodiversity in Developing Countries (2000). Dixon J., Pagiola S. Local Costs,. Environmental Department. – The World Bank, 2000. – Р. 13.
 
5.
Brink B.I.E. 2000. Biodiversity Indicators for the OECD Environmental Outlook and Strategy: a feasibility study. RIVN report, Bilthoven, The Netherlands. – 52 p.
 
6.
Andriyeko T., Balashov L., Pryadko A. Unique marsh array Perebrody in Rovno region / / Ukr. botanical . Journal. - 1976 . - T. 33. - № 5. - S. 532-536 .
 
7.
Reserve land of forests , wetlands and lakes (2007). Voloshinova N.A., Bachuk V.A.
 
8.
Gryschenko Y.M. - Exactly , JSC “ Rivne printing “, 2007 - 200 p.
 
9.
Economy Saving Biodiversity (2002) Ed. A.A. Tishkov . - Moscow: GEF Project “Saving Biodiversity Russian Federation“ Institute of Economics of nature 2002. - 604 p.
 
10.
Yakymchuk A.U. (2007). Economics and Organization of Nature Protection Fund of Ukraine. Monograph. Exactly: NUWMNRU , 2007. - 208 p.
 
11.
Tishkov A.A. (2009). Theory and practice of biodiversity (the methodology of wildlife in Russia) - [Online] www.biodat.ru/doc/lib/tishkov2.htm. [Accessed: 28th August 2013].
 
12.
The Convention on Biological Diversity/ [Online] www.un.org/russian/convents/ biodiv.htm. [Accessed: 28th August 2013].
 
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top