PL EN
Wydawnictwo
WSGE
Wyższa Szkoła Gospodarki
Euroregionalnej
im. Alcide De Gasperi
BOOK CHAPTER (125-143)
Przestępczość gospodarcza zagrożeniem dla rozwoju dużych aglomeracji
 
More details
Hide details
 
 
ABSTRACT
Abstract. Economic crime as a threat to the growth of large cities. Economic criminality is such a common phenomenon that it requires confrontation of differentiated interpretations of this phenomenon not only adaptation of different theoretical constructions. The main issues that should be investigated are: a) causes and ways of establishing rules, b) causes and ways of their infringement, c) range and overlapping areas of activities of organs of administration of justice and organs of control. There arises a question of entitlement - an authorization for a legislator, for people involved in economy and for activities of means or coercion. Since the times of the Old and New Testament there have not been more accepted justification rules for the authority of individuals and institutions from those which being used by the authority are justified and accepted by the majority. Recently, according to the studies carried out by L. Harris, American public opinion expects companies to eliminate crisis and unemployment, control air and water pollution, participate in a recon struction of towns, stimulate worker’s development, eliminate poverty and diseases, liquidate racial discrimination. Public opinion is only a certain argu ment and sometimes an alibi. We have to admit that views concerning and forcing the law are differentiated among authors, who are consensualists, pluralists or look at society from the neo-Marxist point of view. Whatever theoretical alternative for analyses would be, studying primary criminal proc esses concerning economic offences needs priorities. The assessment of functioning of justice system towards limitation of economic criminality shows a relative character for penal-legal intervention which results in choosing not necessarily criminal ways of solving conflicts. On the other hand mutual interaction or its lack between organs of control and administration of justice can create the object of prioritative investiga tion efforts; they can extend both in time and space.Historical studies, such as Jean Claude Waquet’s concerning corruption in Florence in XVII and XVIII centuries help us to understand society as a whole and also the functions and seeing corruption or other economic offences.
 
REFERENCES (31)
1.
Albansese J., What Lockeed and La Cosa Nostra Have in Common.„Crime and Delinquency“, April 1982, s. 211-232.
 
2.
Ambler E., Send No More Roses. In French translation, Paris 1994; H. Barnett, Corporate Crime. “Crime and Delinquency”, January 1991, s. 4-26.
 
3.
Balogh Ch., Some Problems in the Measurement of Economic Offences. Home Office Research Unit, London. “Research Bulletin” nr 10, 1980, s. 36-41.
 
4.
Berckhauer F., Die Strafverfolgung bei schweren Wirtschaftsdelikten. Max-Planck Institut, Freiburg-im-Breisgau, 1981.
 
5.
Bianchi H., Basismodellen in de Kriminologie. Van Loghum Slatevus, Deventer 1980; Morin, Edgar, Pour sortir du XXe.
 
6.
siècle. Nathan, Paris1985.
 
7.
Braithwaite J., Corporate Crime in the Pharmaceutical Industry. Routlege & Kegan Paul, London 1984; J. Braithwaite, Enforced Self-regulation: A New Strategy for Corporate Crime Control. “Michigan Law Review”.
 
8.
nr 80, 1982, s. 1475-1502. 7. Clinard M., Corporate Ethics and Crime. The Role of Middle Management. Sage, Beverly Hills 1983; M. Clinard, Illegal Corporate Behavior. National Institute of Law Enforcement and Criminal Justice, Washington 1979, D.C.
 
9.
Geis G., On White-Collar Crime. D.C. Lexington Books, Heath, 1982;.
 
10.
G. Geis, E. Stotland, White-Collar Crime. Theory and Research. Sage,.
 
11.
London 1980; B. Fisse, J. Braithwaite, The Impact of Publicity on Corporate Offenders. State University of New York Press, Albany, N.Y 1983.
 
12.
Hagan F.E., The Organized Crime Continuum: A Further Specification of a New Conceptual Model. „Criminal Review“ nr 8/2, 1993, s. 52-57.
 
13.
Harris L., The Public Credibility of American Business. Conference Board Record, March 1993, s. 33-38, [w:] D. Szabo: La criminalité d`affaires: Aspects criminologiques. “L`Année sociologique” nr 52.
 
14.
Hebberecht P., De kriminologische Weterschang en de Studie van de primaire Kriminaliseringsprocessen. Thesis. University of Ghent, 1984.
 
15.
Hołyst B., Comparative Criminology. Lexington, Mass. Toronto1983; Braithwaite John, Enforced Self-regulation: A New Strategy for Corporate Crime Control. “Michigan Law Review” nr 80, 1982, s. 1466-1507; J. Braithwaite, B. Fisse, The Impact of Publicity on Corporate Offenders. State University of New York Press, Albany, N.Y 1983.
 
16.
Lodge G., The New American Ideology. Alfred A. Knopf, New York 1976 (quoted by Szabo, D.).
 
17.
Liebl K., Die Bundesweite Erfassung von Wirtschaftsstraftaten nach einheitlichen Gesichtspunkten. Max-Planck Institut, Freiburg-im-Breisgau 1984.
 
18.
Lascoumes P., G. Moreau-Capdevielle, Justice pénale et délinquance d`affaires. Centre d`etudes sociologiques sur le droit et les institutions pénales (CESDIP), Paris 1986; P. Péan , Affaires africaines. Fayard, Paris1987; W. Pommerehne, B. Frey, Les modes d`évaluation de l`économic occulte. Différentes approches et quelques résultats. „Futuribles“ nr 50,.
 
19.
1991, s. 3-32.
 
20.
Lascoumes P., La C.O.B. entre une magistrature économique et une gestion des illégalismes d`affaires. Forthcoming, „Déviance et Société“ nr 9/1, 1995, s. 1-30; P. Lascoumes, G. Moreau-Capdevielle, Justice pénale et délinquance d`affaires. Centre d`etudes sociologiques sur le droit et les institutions pénales (CESDIP), Paris 1993.
 
21.
Nagel I., J. Hagan, The Sentencing of White-collar Criminals in Federal Courts: A Socio-legal Exploration of Disparity. „Michigan Law Review“ nr 80, 1992, s. 1427-1456.
 
22.
Parker J., Social Control and the Legal Profession, [w:] P. Wickman: White-collar and Economic Crime. Multidisciplinary and Cross-national Perspectives. Lexington Books, D.C. Heath 1982; R. Kramer, Corporate Crime: An Organizational Perspective, [w:] P. Wickman, op.cit.
 
23.
Radzinowicz L., Economic Pressures, [w:] The Criminal in Society t. Crime and Justice. L. Radzinowicz i M. Wolfgang (eds.). Basic Book, New York 1971 (quoted by Parker, H.G.).
 
24.
Szabo D., La criminalité d`affaires: Aspects criminologiques. “L`Année sociologique” t. 31, 1981, s. 285-315.
 
25.
Smith Jr., White-collar Crime, Organized Crime, and the Business Establishment: Resolving a Crisis in Criminological Theory, [w:] P. Wickman: White-collar and Economic Crime. Multidisciplinary and Cross-national Perspectives, Lexington Books, D.C. Heath 1985.
 
26.
Spencer J.C., White-collar Crime, [w:] T. Grygier: Criminology in Transition. Tavistock, London 1985.
 
27.
Tomlinson J.D., Economic and Sociological Theories of the Enterprise and Industrial Democracy. „British Jourlan of Sociology“ nr 35/4, 1984, ms. 591-605.
 
28.
Vaughan D., Toward Understanding Unlawful Organizational Behavior. „Michigan Law Review“ nr 80, 1982, s. 1377-1402.
 
29.
Waquet J., De la Corruption, Morale et pouvoir à Florence aux XVIIe etXVIII sièles. Fayard, Paris 1994.
 
30.
Wickman P., White-collar and Economic Crime. Multidisciplinary and Cross-national Perspectives. Lexington Books, D.C. Heath 1982.
 
31.
Wheeler S., The Organization as Weapon in White-collar Crime. „Michigan Law Review“ nr 80, 1982, s. 1403-1426; S. Wheeler, D. Weisburd, N. Bode, Sentencing the White-collar Offender; Theory and Reality. n„American Sociological Review“ nr 47/5, 1982, s. 641-654.
 
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top