PL EN
Wydawnictwo
WSGE
Wyższa Szkoła Gospodarki
Euroregionalnej
im. Alcide De Gasperi
BOOK CHAPTER (127-140)
The right to legal assistance in criminal proceedings: the European Court’s approach and practical challenges
 
More details
Hide details
1
University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland Faculty of Law and Administration Department of Criminalistics and Forensic Medicine
 
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The right to fair trial is one of the most litigated human rights enshrined in the European Convention. The right to legal assistance is an important element of the fair trial. It is recognized, that when it comes to criminal proceedings, the support of a qualified lawyer is imperative to ensure the fairness of the trial and the effective enjoyment of procedural rights by a person suspected or accused of committing a crime. The European Court repeatedly pointed out that without any real access to legal counsel suspects and accused are extremely susceptible to being coerced into giving confessions and into waiving their rights without understanding the consequences. The article focused on the relevant European Court’s case law and highlighted practical challenges associated with the implementation of this right in criminal proceeding, in particularly the issue of the effectiveness of legal assistance. It has always been the position of the Court that the state is not accountable for the actions of an officially appointed lawyer. In Court’s opinion, the conduct of the defense is essentially a matter between the defendant and his counsel. Active state intervention is seen rather as an exception tolerated only in special circumstances. Nevertheless, without diminishing the importance of the independence of lawyers, it should not be seen as more valuable than providing qualified and practical legal assistance to a person suspected or accused of a crime. The effective legal assistance in the pre-trial stage, especially in the critical ones, should be considered as an integral part of the fair trial. When assessing whether adequate legal assistance was provided in specific case, the formal approach is inadmissible. The effectiveness of legal assistance should not be presume by the mere fact, that a person suspected or accused was “equipped” with a counsel whether retained or appointed. The question of the quality of legal assistance should not be seen predominantly as an internal matter of the lawyer’s professional association. There should be independent supervision specific to redress ineffective assistance by the counsel.
 
REFERENCES (12)
1.
Cassim, F. (2005). The accused’s right to be present: a key to meaningful participation in the criminal process. The Comparative and International Law Journal of Southern Africa 38 (2), pp. 285 – 303.
 
2.
Coster van Voorhout, J. E. B. (2016). Ineffective Legal Assistance. Redress for the Accused in Dutch Criminal Procedure and Compliance with ECHR Case Law. Proefschrift. Utrecht: Utrecht University.
 
3.
Christoffersen, H., Beyeler, M., Eichenberger, R., Nannestad, P., Paldam, M. (2014) The Good Society: A Comparative Study of Denmark and Switzerland. Berlin: Springer.
 
4.
Digiusto, E. (2012). Effectiveness of public legal assistance services. A discussion paper. Justice issues. Paper 16. pp. 1-11.
 
5.
Ericson, R. V., Baranek, P. M. (1982). The Ordering of Justice: A Study of Accused Persons as Dependants in the Criminal Process. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
 
6.
Flynn, A., Hodgson, J., McCulloch, J., Naylor, B. (2016). Legal aid and access to legal representation: redefining the right to a fair trial. Melbourne University Law Review. 40. pp. 207-239.
 
7.
Greer, S. (2006). The European Convention on Human Rights. Achievements, Problems and Prospects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
 
8.
JUSTICIA statement on case of Beuze v Belgium at ECHR. Obtained (01.07.2018) from https://www.iccl.ie/staff/just....
 
9.
Robertson, D. (2004). A Dictionary of Human Rights, 2nd edition. London: Psychology Press.
 
10.
Bachmaier Winter, L. (2015). The EU Directive on the Right to Access to a Lawyer: A Critical Assessment. in: Ruggeri, S. (edit.). Human Rights in European Criminal Law. New Developments in European Legislation and case Law after Lisbon Treaty. Switzerland: Springer.
 
11.
Schabas, W. A. (2015). The European Convention on Human Rights. A Commentary. Oxford: Oxford university Press.
 
12.
Summers, S. (2007). Fair Trials: The European Criminal Procedural Tradition and the European Court of Human Rights. Oxford and Portland, Oregon: Hart Publishing.