PL EN
Wydawnictwo
WSGE
Wyższa Szkoła Gospodarki
Euroregionalnej
im. Alcide De Gasperi
ROZDZIAŁ KSIĄŻKI (199-217)
SYSTEM PROBACJI – PREWENCJA A NIE REPRESJA
 
Więcej
Ukryj
 
 
 
REFERENCJE (11)
1.
A Code of Ethics for Social Work: Discussion paper Nr 3, British Association of Social Workers, 1974.
 
2.
A survey of intermediate sanctions, US Department of Justice, Washington, DC 1990 Office of Justice Programs, s. 106, National Institute of Corrections.
 
3.
Bartlett H., The Common Base of Social Work Practice. [National Association of Social Workers] 1970.
 
4.
Barton R., Institutional Neurosis. [John Wright], 1959.
 
5.
Confidentiality in Social Work: Discussion Paper Nr 4, British Association of Social Workers, 1976.
 
6.
Flowers G., Carr T., Ruback R., Special Alternative Incarceration evaluation, Atlanta, s. 101, 1992, Georgia Department of Corrections.
 
7.
MacKenzie D., Parent D., Shock incarceration and prison crowding in Louisiana, „Journal of Criminal Justice”, s. 191, 1991, nr 19.
 
8.
Middleman R. R., Goldberg G., Social Service Delivery: a Struktural Approach. [ColumbiaUniversity Press], 1974.
 
9.
Morris N., Tonry M., Between prison and probation: Intermediate punishments in a rationalsentering system, New York, 1990, Oxford University Press, s. 125.
 
10.
Prison boot carnps: Short-term costs reduced, but long-term impact uncertain, US General Accounting Office, s. 72, Washington, 1993.
 
11.
Shaw J., MacKenzie D., The one-year community supervision performance of drug offenders and Louisiana DOC-identified substance abusers graduating from Shock incarceration, „Journal of Criminal Justice”, s. 91, 1992, nr 20.
 
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top